Chanel’s Animal Testing Policy: A Consumer’s Plea for Change

Chanel and Animal Testing: A Concerned Consumer’s Letter

25 Rue Royale 08917, Badalona

75008 Paris, Spain

France, April 16, 2015

Dear Maureen Chiquet, Director of Chanel,

I am writing to express my concern regarding Chanel’s animal experiments conducted to test your products.

I am very interested to understand why a company as prestigious as Chanel, catering primarily to an upper-class clientele, engages in animal testing practices similar to those of lower-end cosmetic companies. Could you please explain why Chanel commits such barbaric and unnecessary actions? I would be grateful for your response to these questions, but first, I would like to share my perspective.

Firstly, laboratories often choose to test products on live animals because it is a cost-effective approach. However, this does not necessarily mean that the results obtained have greater scientific validity.

Secondly, millions of animals are subjected to various tests for cosmetic products, enduring cruel and painful procedures. These tests are often repeated unnecessarily and without mercy, year after year. It is important to remember that these are living beings with nervous systems capable of feeling pain, just as we do.

Moreover, many laboratories are now developing artificial human skin models in 3D as an alternative to animal testing. These models allow researchers to observe how a product might affect the human body and examine its effects on different layers of the skin. I believe this would be a viable alternative for Chanel, given its large consumer base and substantial profits, which could easily support this innovative approach.

Finally, cosmetic animal testing is not specifically required by law. To ensure a product’s safety, validated non-animal tests and combinations of existing ingredients known to be safe for human use can be employed.

Could you please consider my concerns and inform me of the alternative testing methods Chanel intends to use? Please remember that consumers have the power to exert pressure. While some laboratories may prioritize economic interests over ethical considerations, we can influence their policies through boycotts and protest campaigns. If Chanel were to change its practices, it could inspire widespread change throughout the industry. Beauty should not come at the cost of cruelty.

I look forward to your response. Thank you for considering my letter.

Yours sincerely,

Yusra Yacubi

Useful Phrases:

  • Instead of: another thing/ secondly/ Use: secondly
  • Instead of: the first problem was/ firstly Use: firstly
  • Instead of: Best wishes/ yours faitfully Use: Yours faithfully
  • Instead of: I expect to receive/ you must send me Use: Please send me
  • Instead of: I know/ I can accept Use: I understand
  • Instead of: Please write soon/ I look forward to hearing from you Use: I look forward to hearing from you
  • Instead of: I am writing to complain about/ I am really angry about Use: I am writing to enquire about / apply for/ complain about…which I read about in..which was advertised in…which I purchased (from)..
  • Instead of: Could you (possibly)..? / I Would like to know more about…/ Would it be possible to..?/ Use: I would be grateful if you could..
  • Useful phrases: In addition, furthermore, finally, moreover, first of all..
  • Useful phrases: I have attached, enclosed (letter) a CV/ photo/ sample of work for your reference.
  • Useful phrases: Please contact me if you require any further information. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you in advance for your help.