Classical & Human Relations Schools of Management: A Comparative Analysis
Classical School of Management
Scientific Management (Taylor)
Idea: Increasing productivity through improved operator efficiency by scientifically studying labor productivity incentives. Man is seen as an appendage of the machine.
Key Aspects:
- Emphasis on efficiency
- Division and functional specialization of labor
- Specialized middle management supervision
- Limited authority and responsibility
- Incentive systems
Four Principles:
- Replacing practical rules with scientific precepts
- Obtaining harmony rather than discord
- Cooperation instead of individualism
- Scientific selection, education, and development of workers
Administrative Theory (Fayol)
Idea: Increased efficiency through optimized form and components, focusing on administrative provisions and structure.
Five Functions of Management:
- Forecasting change
- Organizing resources for each sub-function
- Directing strategies
- Coordinating objectives through supervision
- Controlling
Fourteen Principles of Management:
- Division of work
- Authority and responsibility
- Discipline
- Unity of command
- Unity of direction
- General interest over individual interest
- Fair staff remuneration
- Delegation vs. centralization
- Hierarchies
- Order
- Equity
- Staff stability
- Initiative
- Team spirit (esprit de corps)
Criticisms:
- Simplistic organizational approaches
- Strong centralization
- Neglect of the informal organization
- Closed rational vision
- Excessive rigidity
- Waste of talent, encouraging alienation and lack of commitment
Bureaucratic School (Weber)
Key Elements: Centralized authority and power, creating an efficient but slow organizational form. Emphasis on organizational design.
Ideal Bureaucracy Characteristics:
- Standardized behavior
- Division of labor and specialization
- Hierarchy of authority
- Formalization
- Procedures and rules
- Trained personnel
- Separation between ownership and management, with fixed wages
Bureaucratic Goals:
- Predictable human behavior
- Standardized tasks
Expected Results: Increased efficiency and productivity, fairness, and transparency of decisions.
Unforeseen Results: Lack of motivation, impersonal atmosphere, excessive red tape, inefficiency, and rigidity.
Criticisms: Excessive formality and routine, neglect of the informal organization and individual personality, and a mechanistic conception of work.
Human Relations School (Elton Mayo)
Originated from the shortcomings of the classical schools, addressing the dehumanization of work, influenced by:
- Development of industrial psychology and sociology
- Skilled labor
- Growth of enterprises
- Experimental results
- Personal relationships, trust, informal groups, democratic leadership, and job satisfaction leading to increased productivity
Contributions Against the Classical School: Decentralized decision-making, consideration of group motivation, less authoritarian supervision, greater emphasis on external scrutiny than accountability, worker participation, motivation theory, and social and technical skills.
Criticisms: Understatement of technical factors, closed system view, lack of understanding of conflict, paternalistic approach, and little consideration of unions.
McGregor’s Theories
Theory X (Tayloristic):
Humans are averse to work, avoid responsibility, and are primarily motivated by economic means.
Theory Y (McGregor):
Humans desire self-improvement, are responsible for goals, and are motivated by responsible jobs.
Strategy
Components: Scope, distinctive capabilities, competitive advantages (cost, differentiation), and synergy.
Growth Strategies: Specialization or diversification (horizontal, vertical, or relational), internationalization, and growth methods (internal, external, or hybrid).
Competitive Strategy: Cost leadership or differentiation.
Just In Time (JIT)
Principles: Reduction of manufacturing time, zero defects, breakdowns, paperwork, stocks, and deadlines; reusability; flexible machines; specialized production; Kanban system; good worker treatment; worker autonomy and flexibility; U-shaped work cells; versatile workers; few suppliers for greater commitment and stability; defect control; and machine maintenance by workers.
Advantages: Reduced production costs and increased quality, reduced inventory levels, shorter manufacturing cycles, improved internal communication, promoted teamwork, and problem-solving in the manufacturing process.