Elizabeth Johnson: Justice, Race, and Gender in Theology
Justice, Race, and Gender: An Analysis of Elizabeth Johnson’s Theology
In our daily lives, injustice is rampant. As those striving to be “men and women for others,” understanding the significance of this concept is crucial. Elizabeth Johnson raises important and often controversial points, specifically addressing Cone’s idea that, in a racist society, “God is Black,” and the feminist perspective on Jesus. Some feminists argue that Jesus’ gender excludes women, legitimizing patriarchy and androcentrism. These are clear examples of injustice.
The Claim That “God is Black”: A Critical Examination
Elizabeth Johnson challenges the notion that claiming “God is Black” is inherently racist. While the statement itself might seem discriminatory, she argues that God transcends race, gender, and specific identities. We are all made in His image, making us all part of Him. The concept of a Black God originated from Black people who, historically, sought to disassociate God from their oppressors (white people). However, this exclusion of white people, implying they are from the devil, contradicts God’s message of non-discrimination. Therefore, claiming “God is Black” can be interpreted as racist. This statement emphasizes that God is not exclusive to any race; He created everyone and expects us to treat each other with respect. It calls for forgiveness from Black people towards their brothers and sisters for past injustices and reminds white people that they are not entitled to privileges over other races or ethnicities.
Feminist Perspectives on Jesus and Patriarchy
Feminists argue that Jesus’ masculinity legitimizes patriarchy and androcentrism. Patriarchy is the idea that men dominate government and leadership roles, while women are excluded. Androcentrism centers ideas and objectives around men. Jesus’ presence as a man is significant because he is considered the head of the Christian religion. This exclusion of women, who are still barred from becoming priests in some denominations, is seen as unfair. Men have historically used Jesus’ gender to assert power over women, regarding themselves as more important. However, Johnson argues that Jesus’ teachings proclaim justice for all, including women. Those who discount the credibility and power of women defy God’s will. Thus, Jesus’ gender is irrelevant; Christianity celebrates God’s lack of gender.
Conclusion: God’s Inclusivity and the Pursuit of Justice
Elizabeth Johnson highlights crucial points regarding justice, particularly concerning race and gender. God is non-discriminatory, without gender or race, and inclusive of everyone and everything.