Fiber Composites: Properties and Matrix Comparison
Glass Fiber
- Easily converted into high resistance fibers.
- Easily available and economically achievable.
- Compatible with most manufacturing processes.
- Relatively strong fibers, but stiffness not very high.
- Chemically inert when combined with many plastics.
- Good adhesion with most resins.
- Small thermal expansion.
The basic constituent of glass fiber is silicon, combined with other elements. To avoid surface defects due to abrasion during the wire drawing process, a sizing coating is used.
Carbon Fiber
- Very high elastic modulus.
- High strength (HS) or high modulus (HM) fibers.
- High compression and fatigue strength.
- High temperature resistant in non-oxidant atmosphere.
- Chemically resistant at room temperature.
- Thermal expansion is zero, even negative in the fiber’s longitudinal direction.
- Good electrical and thermal conductivity.
- Good resistance to humidity.
Disadvantages
- Expensive.
- Low toughness and bad abrasion-resistant.
- Does not support oxidant acids at high temperatures, nor metals that can form carbides.
Organic Fibers
Difficult manufacturing
Aramid or Aromatic Polyamide
- High specific tensile strength.
- Zero or negative thermal expansion in longitudinal direction.
- Very good absorption of vibrations.
- Very good impact resistant, as well as penetration, abrasion and fatigue resistant.
- Good chemical resistant except to very hard acid or bases.
Drawbacks
Weak at compression (so in bending), hygroscopic (absorb water) and adhesion with resins not good. Must be cut with specific cutters or scissors.
Fibers Comparison
Glass Fiber: Cheap, especially mat. Lightweight, toughness, stiffness and strength. Improvements in stiffness and strength when cloth glass fiber is used.
Aramid Fibers: High strength, toughness and low density, BUT expensive. Low compressive strength, UV degradation and difficult to cut.
Carbon Fibers: High tensile and compressive strength, stiffness, low density, good fatigue response BUT very expensive. Fragile when subjected to impact and aesthetically attractive. Lightweight applications in which, stiffness and strength are crucial.
Matrix Phase
- Connects fibers and transmits forces.
- Protects fibers from abrasion, chemical reactions.
- Separates fibers and avoids crack propagation (ductility, plasticity).
Strength depends on the fiber-matrix interface.
Organic Matrix
- Thermoplastics (polypropylene, polycarbonate, polystyrene)
- Properties depend on monomers, not on curing.
- Soften and flow as temperature raises.
- High viscosity: infiltration problems (matrix does not reach all fibers).
- High contraction when solidification.
- Higher toughness and cheaper than resins (thermosets).
- Thermoset resins (epoxy, polyester, phenolic)
- Most used; low viscosity so good, impregnation; different fiber lengths admitted.
- Properties depend on the initial molecule and intermolecular bonds (% curing).
- They do not soften with temperature.
- Curing: room temperature or higher.
- Post-curing: necessary for optimal properties.
- Fragile.
- Volatile products are released during processing.
- Better properties than thermoplastics.
Epoxy
- Good long term stability.
- High strength.
- More expensive than polyester.
- Longer curing time.
Polyester
- Fast curing.
- Cheap.
- Easy to use.
- Worse mechanical properties.
- Worse long term stability.