Inventory Management: Balancing Costs and Avoiding Stockouts

6-4. Storing large quantities of inventory can eliminate shortages and stockouts. On the other hand, storing large quantities of inventory can significantly increase the cost of carrying or holding inventory. Therefore, a delicate balance must be sought between increased carrying costs and shortages and stockouts. In determining how much inventory a company should have on hand to avoid shortages and stockouts, the overall objective is to minimize carrying costs and shortage or stockout costs.

6-11. The assumptions made in the production run model are the same assumptions made in the economic order quantity with the exception that the instantaneous receipt of inventory assumption is eliminated. Thus, the assumptions are that the demand is known and constant, the lead time is known and constant, quantity discounts are not allowed, ordering cost and carrying cost are the only variable costs, and stockouts and shortages can be completely eliminated.

6-12. When the daily production rate becomes very large, the production run model becomes identical to the economic quantity model. This is because the fraction d/p approaches zero as the production rate becomes very large.

6-20. d = 100,000; co = $10; ch = $0.005

a. 35fdirB8W62ldmoKmjLz8hlZifhqjtr1Sb1PP3L0

b. Number of orders per year

OArjiLMv6VcaxngmMfqUplyScKozgZcYpVkrbocW

Total ordering cost = 5($10) = $50 per year

c. Average inventory

9rXAQAgSs5FhoB74ADmVbSVlk34M7ZADhhBT+wFW

Total holding cost = 10,000(0.005) = $50 per year

6-21. ROP = 8 days × (500 screws/day) = 4,000 number 6 screws

6-25. d = 500 sandals; co = $10

If q* = 100,

yUnK9epy9zN85Quq9MzfywaS3Ly++Iaf80eJJHDA

ch = $1, which is 20% of cost.

If ch = 10% of $5 = $0.50,

SvFjGwZNbBMAMeQZKEx5WDD4xH5GZJfaGk8MeP8E

6-26. Optimal order quantity is proportional to the square root of the ordering cost.

When co = $10, q* = 20,000 screws

arDOBeUSQKp8myuUYxyfIaUZEAG9BwaOujKG2ziq

AAcssBhBAAA7

6-27.

a. jHwge9zIAQnCCEKWjAPQQAAOw==

b. Average inventory

68OcsUUaFdbFxTipRLK1hPmzahdI2qVCdRTWW9yr

Annual holding cost

CSOWpBS5GqeVeeuzSYxL5eFEnPW3ynqCPhkq1Ahl

c. Number of orders per year

Si5jGnTzgpCJRI0fOn0aNIjT68FgNlDYYkziUloa

Annual ordering cost

gif;base64,R0lGODlhDAATAHcAMSH+GlNvZnR3Y

YqGMZRO23449VZADkkNiQNQR0RCbpBB8C9KRkjUE

d. Total cost = $187.5 + $187.5 + 2500(15) = $37,875

e. With 250 days per year, and 10 orders per year, the number of days between orders = 250/10 = 25 days.

f. ROP = d × l = (2500 units per year/250 days per year) × 2 = 20 units

6-28.

a. Daily demand = 2500/250 = 10 units per day

b. lQVKYdjYI3naVTAQFVj+qixMsagdQ+ROsMQBRoVK

c. 324.92/50 = 6.5 days.

Inventory sold = (10 units/day)(6.5 days) = 65 units.

d. Maximum inventory level = q(1 – d/p) = 324.92(1 – 10/ 50)= 259.94

Average inventory = 0.5(maximum inventory level) = 0.5 (259.94) = 129.97

Annual holding cost = (average inventory) ch = 129.97 (1.48) = $192.35

e. Number of production runs = d/q =2500/324.92 = 7.694

Annual setup cost = (d/q)cs = 7.694(25) = $192.35

f. Including the cost of production, the annual cost is $192.35 + $192.35 + 2,500(14.80) = $37,384.71

g. ROP = d × l = 10 × 0.5 = 5 units

6-29.

a. Total cost = ordering cost + holding cost + purchase cost

b36gTfaFgwAAOw==

Plrz0EdfRRAAOw==

= 46.88 + 725 + 36,250 = $37,021.88

b. Since the lead time has changed, the ROP also changes.

ROP = d × l = (10) × 3 = 30 units

c. The lowest cost is $37,021.88, so he should order 1,000 units each time an order is placed.

6-36. d = 1,000; unit cost = $50; co = $40; ch = 0.25 × unit cost

Ny++fBSCQMrJcMJ+GwqP5GLLGzFh88ccYcY8yxHk

With discount, unit cost = (1 – 0.03) × $50 = $48.50

uycmnZ5mFhHlCvBfGBs7k6J4u97kah6dZKAVVErm

Which should be adjusted to minimum orderable quantity (i.e., 200).

Original total cost = $51,000

Discount cost

91Y4YxzOECNZeT09zkHQ6Klw6HWL8rvAkrbSkMO4

Therefore, North Manufacturing should take the discount.