Max Weber’s Ideal Types, Capitalism, and Protestantism

Ideal Types

Scientific progress, for Weber, means the gradual elimination of hidden and unpredictable powers and the increasing establishment of calculation and prediction, i.e., the exclusion of magic. Ideal types are stylized reconstructions of reality according to some typical features, elements, or accents, which help us to a rational understanding of reality. The importance of ideal types can be summarized in the following considerations:

  1. The ideal type aims to guide the trial of attributing the investigation.
  2. It is a hypothesis; you want to target in training is a hypothesis.
  3. No exposure. Actually, that claim to give unambiguous means of expression for representation.
  4. It is not average but the unilateral enhancement of one or several points of view and the collection of a multitude of unique events that fit into a conceptual self-unitary.
  5. Empirically undiscoverable reality: utopia that historiography can check whether it agrees with reality.
  6. Employed with caution, it can be very useful for research purposes and allows illustration.
  7. Synthesis, which otherwise might not try to apprehend.
  8. In generic concepts, historical individuals or their elements.
  9. No confusion of reality and models, using them as the essence of reality or as those of Procrustes.

Capitalism and Religion

Weber agrees with Marx in his account of the essence of the capitalist system as the search for gain through the market and the definitive accumulation. Weber’s thesis on the origins of capitalism is that there is an affinity between the spirit of capitalism and the spirit of Protestantism. In contrast to Marx, who saw that the various types of religion were merely reflections of various types of society, Weber tells us that the kinds of society might reflect the types of religion.

Weber’s Sociology

Relates to Marx’s thought by his common attempt to capture the interrelationships of institutional orders that sustain the social structure. Weber’s work on military, religious, political, and legal systems relates primarily to the economic order of several forms. Weber developed a typology of ways of salvation to analyze the relationship between world religions and the economy:

  • Asceticism combines with action-oriented commitment to self-believers and refuse earthly pleasures. It distinguishes two types:
    1. Worldly asceticism sets rules and values that bind believers to work within the secular world but also to combat Asceticism.
    2. Intramundane asceticism is taken for the more important because this guy was Calvinism (which was the main object of study) that rejects the world but urges its members to work within the world so that they can attain salvation, or at least signs of it.
  • Mysticism that involves contemplation, emotion, and inactivity.
    1. Rejection of the world’s total seclusion.
    2. Intramundane Mysticism makes efforts to understand the world; efforts are doomed to fail because the world is beyond the comprehension skills of the individual.

The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

This is the most important and best-known work of Weber; it is the effect of ascetic Protestantism in the birth of the Spirit of Capitalism. In this book, he tells us that the Protestant ethic is not about the rise of capitalism but rather the origin of a particular spirit that made possible the existence of capitalism. He makes this deduction from your observation that the leaders of the economic system were all Protestants. This meant that Protestantism was a significant cause in the election of those professions and, conversely, that other religions have failed in producing ideological systems that led individuals into these vocations, i.e., was the moral system that led to the unprecedented expansion of the pursuit of profits and ultimately the capitalist system. For Weber, the spirit of capitalism is the idea that it is the duty of people to constantly increase their wealth, and this places the Spirit of Capitalism outside the space and individual ambition within the category of ethical imperatives. But as he believes that Protestantism was crucial to the birth of the capitalist spirit, Weber tells us that it was imperative for the perpetuation of the economic system. In fact, given its secular capitalism in many ways opposed to religion. Capitalism today has become a real entity that combines norms, values, market, money, and laws. This seems related to the theoretical idea that people create social structures, but these structures will soon come to life for themselves, to the extent that their creators have little or no control over them (Sociology of reification). Like studying the role of Protestantism in the emergence of the capitalist spirit, Weber was concerned to see that other religions had not affected the same way. In endeavoring to answer this question, Weber observed spiritual and material barriers that prevented the rise of capitalism. Finally, and in conclusion, we note that in the Weberian thesis there is a pattern that repeats:

  1. It is part of a proposal of Marx, who is accepted as important but rather an interpretation.
  2. The version is enriched by Marx and other elements that seem to supplement and give more depth and interpretative strength analysis, but ultimately these new elements seem to be really important.