OPEC, IEA, and Global Energy Dynamics

Posted on Feb 5, 2025 in Economy

OPEC vs. Non-OPEC Countries

OPEC countries generally attempt to control the oil market by restricting production, though their success varies. Non-OPEC countries are often viewed as free-riders. OPEC, a coalition of 12-14 countries, is primarily driven by business and politics. The common belief that Saudi Arabia solely adjusts production to stabilize the market has been proven inaccurate on multiple occasions, although cooperation within OPEC persists despite past conflicts and failures since its founding in 1960.

The Customer Side: IEA

In 1973, Arab OPEC members (excluding Iraq) reduced oil production. In response, Henry Kissinger advocated for a counter-strategy, leading to the formation of the International Energy Agency (IEA) in 1974 by the OECD. A core principle of the IEA is the requirement for member countries to maintain oil reserves equivalent to 90 days of consumption. This reserve has been utilized three times in history, notably in 1990 during the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. While IEA cooperation isn’t flawless, it remains a significant factor.

Lack of a Central Energy Organization

Unlike the IMF for global financial crises or the World Bank for development, there’s no single, prominent international organization responsible for energy. A major concern is climate change and CO2 emissions, with the oil sector contributing approximately one-third of the total.

Emergence of New Consumers and Production Challenges

Recently, China and India have emerged as major oil consumers. However, production growth was slow in the early 21st century due to low investment, low prices, and a weak economic situation. Oil-producing countries with surplus funds prioritized debt repayment and government financing over oil exploration. Furthermore, countries began to realize the extent of their oil reserves and the potential for higher prices in the future, leading to a strategy of delayed production.

Key Objectives in International Energy

1. Security of Energy Supply and Demand

For a long time, the primary dynamic was the opposition between OPEC and the International Energy Agency. Developing countries, particularly in Latin America, faced significant challenges. In the 1990s, energy security, including the security of transport routes, became paramount. Long-term investments were needed to ensure the security of demand. Producers argued for guarantees if they were to invest billions in new oil fields, a perspective often overlooked in the literature. From 2000 to 2008, Russia was a major oil supplier, providing half of the oil.

2. Economic Development

• Energy Poverty: A significant portion of the global population lacks access to electricity. While burning coal and oil is a readily available solution, it is widely opposed due to climate change concerns. Natural gas is a relatively cheap and environmentally friendly alternative, but infrastructure development is expensive. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind are intermittent and dependent on weather and geography.
• Technology Transfer: This is a crucial aspect.
• Macroeconomic Stability: This remains a risk in many countries.

3. International Security

• Nuclear Energy: The focus is on safely selling and cooperating with nuclear technology while mitigating security risks. There’s a delicate balance between developing efficient reactors and preventing security breaches.
• Relationship between Oil and International Arms Trade: Secure sea lanes are essential for international trade, requiring protection from terrorist and cyberattacks.

4. Environmental Sustainability

The impact of the energy market on the climate is a critical question. Determining the price people are willing to pay for environmental protection is crucial. When considering emissions produced in other continents and those embedded in imported goods, Europe’s overall emissions are increasing. Transparency is essential.

5. Domestic Good Governance

This is also an important factor.

Keynesianism vs. Neoliberalism