Parsons’ Agile System: Functional Imperatives & Social State of Law
Parsons’ Agile System
Parsons’ agile system, highly influenced by Weber, is divided into four sub-systems that correspond to the parts of the agile scheme:
- Organismic Behavior (Adaptation)
- Supervisory Systems/Personality (Ability to Achieve Goals)
- Social System (Integration)
- Cultural System (Latency)
LI Structure
SIST. CULTURAL SOCIAL SYSTEM
ORG. CONDUCTUAL SIST. THE PER –
Songal
AG
L: We provide the values and social norms, attitudes, and values.
I: We live in and we have to adapt to society. The mainstreamed society or other parties and those parts that share are successful: We give energy to the system but stripped of personality, adaptability.
G: Works to achieve goals.
At its most general level, the four functional imperatives are associated with these four body systems of action. The biological action system plays the role of adaptation to fit their external world. The processing system performs the function of personality, achieving goals through the definition of system goals and mobilizing resources to achieve them. The social system deals with the terms of integration, by controlling their constituent parts, and the cultural system has the function of providing the actors with the norms and values that motivate them to action.
The Social State of Law
Factors of appearance:
- Struggles of the working class, socialist state.
- Communist capitalism.
- Economic crisis of 1929.
- The social democratic parties.
The Crisis of the 1930s
Launched in the early 20th century, capital control measures to enforce the techniques of scientific management extended for decades, with periods of acceleration and quick process, and also with slow pace and moments of true stagnation. Streamlining the work is progressing only gradually and shocks with an uneven pace and speed according to the branches, industries, and economic terms means workshops. Using that at any time and for a comparable use of goods is always a coexistence of different types of work processes equally ineffective from the point of view of the valuation of invested capital and value and creates differences in productivity, but these differences cannot just take time for much. With bringing ruin to the production units based on the media less effective. If it accelerates the pace of ruin, weak units would affect a large amount of workshops and we would have a CRISIS. The rationalization of work processes is a constant factor crisis. When transport and result in the invalidation takes place of goods produced on that bases to the same progress basicas. This exo is the origin of chain bankruptcies that characterizing the 1930s. Setting new standards of consumption shook and breaks, the destruction of antiques domestic balance and validity of subject to change money as they reinforce eyos but mutations occur in the presence of CLACE obrera. The series production created the conditions of mass consumption but the relationship between production and consumption is established over time. To ensure the remarketing required the use of new techniques forzoso. The consumption in developing mass production is comtemporanero in stores where the worker is paid in vouchers to purchase only in the mass production is establecimiento. The classifica-tion of purchasing power enough in wages and income where x posibiblidades crisis were differences in productivity between work processes.