Portfolio Analysis: SBU, BCG Matrix & Experience Curve
Portfolio Analysis and Life-Cycle Concepts
Strategic Business Unit (SBU)
Definition
An SBU is a single unit within a company responsible for a well-defined market. It may formulate and conduct its own strategic plans in this market.
Impact
SBUs are typically smaller but more flexible than large organizations.
Criteria
- Technology
- Product
- Application
- Customer
- Country
Features
- Technical data
- Age
- Position in the product life-cycle
- Units sold (aggregate quantity, currently)
- Market share (percentage of total market, relative to the largest competitor)
- Knowledge of the market
- Market growth
- Competitors
- Market volatility
- Market attractiveness
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix
Market Position Categories
- Stars: High growth, high share
- Question Marks: High growth, low share
- Cash Cows: Low growth, high share
- Dogs: Low growth, low share
Recommended Strategies
- Stars: Invest to maintain or strengthen the position.
- Question Marks: Develop into Stars or divest/skim.
- Cash Cows: Hold position and use cash surplus to fund Stars or Question Marks.
- Dogs: Divest/skim or quit the market.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Complexity reduction
- Visualization
- Systematic strategy recommendations
- Flexibility
Cons:
- Recommended strategies can be too general.
- The importance of market share may be lower for differentiated goods.
- Market definition is crucial but often ambiguous.
Experience Curve Concept
The recommended strategies in the BCG growth-share matrix are often based on the experience curve concept: higher experience leads to lower costs and potentially higher profits. In the long run, market share can serve as a proxy measure for experience.
Concept Definition
The total unit cost for a firm’s value contribution to a product decreases with the cumulative aggregate output. With each doubling of aggregate output, costs are typically reduced by a certain percentage.
Reasons for Cost Reduction
- Decreased labor input per unit due to learning effects.
- More efficient use of machinery.
- Cost-reducing substitution of inputs.
- Investment in improved machinery.
- Increased specialization.
Benefits
- Fundamentally sound concept.
- Provides a starting point for cost management discussions.
- Can be used as an argument for supplier price reductions based on volume.
- A useful analytical tool.
Market Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
These dimensions are often used in portfolio analysis (e.g., the GE/McKinsey Matrix) as alternatives or complements to the BCG matrix axes.
Market Attractiveness Factors
- Market size
- Growth rate
- Profit margins
- Intensity of competition
- Volatility
Competitive Strength Factors
- Market share
- Prices
- Product quality
- Knowledge of customers
- Synergies with other SBUs
- Geographic aspects
Advantages (Compared to BCG)
- No restriction to using only market growth for market attractiveness.
- No restriction to using only market share for competitive strength.
Disadvantages
- Construction of the matrix can be subjective or arbitrary.
- Quantification of factors is not always obvious.
- Can be more complicated to implement than the BCG matrix.