Sigismund’s Free Will: Triumph Over Fate in Literature
New Evidence
With the new purpose of doing well after his initial failure, Sigismund began a new stage in his heroic journey. The character struggles against his instincts, which make him angry and prone to boasting.
The climax comes with the encounter with Rosaura. Sigismund disappoints the ruse concocted by his father and discovers that what he lived at the court was not a dream.
Also faced with the biggest temptation for self-control: moved by the beauty of Rosaura, he could take advantage of the opportunity that presents itself and enjoy it. However, as his greatest triumph over his passions, he remembers his ideal of doing good. He has triumphed over himself, has abandoned the wild beast to exercise his role as a man.
The Triumph of Free Will
The problem with Basilio is that he does not truly trust in human free will. But Sigismund brings a message about the power of free choice and the need to educate man so that he can use it properly. Sigismund argues against the actions of his father and demonstrates his error. His father could not beat fate, but Sigismund did through the power of his will. All the predicted facts are true: sedition in the kingdom, riots, Basilio at the foot of Sigismund, but human freedom produces a big difference, because Basilio was not crushed by his son, but gave himself to him. Here is the triumph of the hero and the disavowal of prediction.
God’s plans are inscrutable, and should not be judged lightly. Man should not be so arrogant as to believe that he is able to know the future, nor should he become a tyrant to other men. But he must know that he can always choose and direct his life toward good or evil.
Opinion Texts
Opinion texts present the viewpoint of an editor on a topic and convince the reader of the validity of his position. When the authorship is not signed, it is an editorial. Opinion articles are argumentative texts. They summarize the various opinions or views that circulate in society. The issues on which they argue are controversial.
Reason
Reason is a discursive procedure that is intended to convince or persuade on a particular topic by presenting a variety of reasons called arguments.
Characteristics of Argumentative Texts
- Persuasion: The author’s purpose is to influence the receiver with respect to a subject.
- Strategies: The sender uses linguistic and discursive resources to convince the recipients of their position.
- Textual Organization: Argumentative texts are structured according to the presentation of a number of ideas that support the author’s reasoning. Arguments are drawn to a conclusion.
- Contentious Topics: Argumentative texts develop topics that are discussed in a society that has different opinions.
- Recipient: They target a specific sector that matches the values and beliefs which underlie the reasoning.
Structure of Argumentative Texts
- Theme
- Hypothesis or thesis: This is the opinion of the author.
- Demonstration: Through arguments, the author defends his hypothesis.
- Conclusion: Closing argument.
This type of structure is not fixed.
Support Resources
- Comparison: Establishing similarity or difference between two elements.
- Example: Introducing a situation that illustrates the opinion or viewpoint.
- Explanation: Developing a concept so that the receiver understands its importance.
- Generalization: Taking a particular situation and elevating it to a more general level.
- Cause and Effect: Relating two events, featuring one as a result or outcome of another.
- Counterargument: Reasoning or argument presented to discuss or argue against another.
Discourse Organizers
- Argumentative: Comparing information, mitigating or reinforcing, by contrast, although, however, but, nevertheless, and, similarly, mostly, even.
- Logical Connectors: Organizing the distribution of information in the text: first, second, to begin, finally, etc.
- Explanatory: Establishing relations of cause and effect: because, so, since, in this way, the same way, i.e.