The Religious Creativity of Man: Exploring Humanity’s Relationship with the Sacred

1:

The religious creativity of man


In the ultimate enigma man has tried to imagine, define the mystery in relation to itself, and therefore tried to devise a form of relationship with him and express all aesthetic reflections that the act of imagining to the latter gave him .- (Here is the religion that is essentially man’s relationship with the sacred and as exposed as numinous numinous value .-)
This human effort, called Imagination, is strictly on the basis of the link with reality and is therefore reasonable expression. The awareness of a significant real world and is closely linked to the discovery of the sacred. The sacred is an element in the structure of consciousness and not a stage of consciousness man misma.No there somehow, even without thinking, does not identify a response to the question of what ultimately constitutes him. This imagination is the work of the natural dynamism of reason and therefore the fruit and expression of a cultural nature that is its sujeto.Etimológicamente (imagination) – is supportive of image, representation, imitación.Cada man does, this attempt to identify, to imagine that that gives meaning. A religion depends on the historical situation of environmental and temperamental person podrís create personas.Teóricamente each religion. But in the life of nature’s role is corporate creator: the role of genius. This is an eminently social charisma, which expresses in the midst of human company, so much sharper than others, so they feel is best expressed by him that they mismos.Cuando is on top of his reason, in the perception of the mystery man at any time in its long history supports such intuition vertigo. The man seeking higher ground to the extent to which your creativity can build the place of his relationship with misterio.Son innumerable traces of this creativity that man has made along the way, from prehistory to the present day . The man, before the mystery they perceive as crucial for him, acknowledges his power and, not withstanding the left to an unknown, try to imagine otherwise in connection with it in terms that are in terms of itself: 1)-The man knows, and strives to establish a relationship of intercambio.El man feels he must immerse themselves in the harmonious flow of the cosmos and of history and, following the rules of harmony interview as being driven by her inner strength, pursues its destination and imagine the mystery as the origin and result of the natural harmony which he tries obedecer.Hay an exchange, a covenant, a contract between the imagined forces that guide the world and man, which wants to give meaning and effectiveness to long live (attitude of man to relate to the mystery, relationship between man and God) .- 2) Man does not know, but you risk, the appeal and relied on the willingness of the Other (paradoxical action). Everyone feels a inevitable requirement for what the ultimate sense, all of its own and timely contingency. All religious construction reflects the fact that everyone makes the effort they can. All have the common intent.
What the difference is the mode of expression that depends on many factors, but the versions do not dent the value mentioned.
Abanico scenario: • by realizing the man aware of the existence of many religions. This has the impression that, to be sure of the correctness of their own choice, should begin to study them all, compare them and choose (rationalists). This position is not ideal, but a utopia. Suggest an impossible job, false ideal. The ideal is the ongoing dynamic of man’s nature and at each step some of it is true. Utopia is beyond nature. (not being applicable, ceases to be a natural approach, rational) .- · this criterion also try to know at least the major religions, the most followed from a numerical point of view. If I look at this position would be ignored and that tiny group of men and would never have found my truth, however, was there .- · idea syncretism create a kind of universal religion, to take the best of each religion (synthesis of the best of humanity)
. But this ignores that the best for one may not be best for another, the people should be subject to the will of an enlightened group. Solution empirical · the man born in a given area at a given moment in history, the religion that expresses their environment is more likely to be less inappropriate religious expression to his temperament. That every man should follow the religion of their tradition (left open the possibility of changing) .- All religions are true. The only duty of man is the seriousness in adhering to them.