Understanding Gravity Equation, Monopoly, Cournot, and Intra-Industry Trade
Gravity Equation
GRAVITY EQUATION:
Τ =????∗????????∗????????/????????
D increases – T decreases / Y increases – T increases
Tij = the value of trade between country i and country j – bilateral trade flow
A = a constant
Yi = GDP of country i (exporter)
Yj = GDP of country j (importer)
Dij = distance between both countries (bilateral trade friction) – impact of distance increased over time (modern transportation over time and communication – hard to find data: Distance puzzle)
Size (GDP): of an economy is directly related to the volume of imports and exports (not quantity); larger economies produce and export more => more income => more money for imports.
Distance: influences transportation costs and therefore costs of imports and exports; can also influence personal contact and communication.
Cultural affinity: cultural ties make economic ties more likely; language is an important barrier to trade.
Geography: ocean harbors and a lack of mountain barriers make transport easier.
Multinational corporations: corporations spread across nations shift their goods between their divisions.
Borders: crossing borders involves formalities and takes time and perhaps tariffs.
log ???????????? = log ???? + ???????????????????????? + ???????????????????????? − ???????????????????????????? + Ɛ????????
- The log of bilateral trade flow is explained through the log of a constant and the log of both country’s GDPs reduced by the log of the distance between the countries (plus the error term).
- The GDPs have a high positive impact.
- The D has an important negative impact.
Findings: Distance should have decreased over time due to globalization. Normally, there should be a “death of distance”. Distance is used as a proxy for transportation costs which declined. Nevertheless, the coefficient “distance” is increasing over time => Distance Puzzle
Monopoly
MONOPOLY:
Many producers in the X sector; perfect competition: pF = MCF / Single producer (monopolist) in the Y sector; profit maximization: pM????(1-1/????) = MCM
At the autarky equilibrium we know:
- domestic demand = domestic supply (consump=produc) MRT = MCM/MCF
- Utility max. gives: MRS = pM/pF
- Profit max. gives: pF = MCF & pM????(1-1/????) = MCM
The autarky equilibrium with a monopoly is not optimal; the equilibrium is distorted:
- A higher welfare level can be reached at point pc (= perfect competition, where MRS = MRT = price ratio)
- The extent of the distortion (Verzerrung) depends on the ratio MRT / MRS = (1-1/????) and thus on the mark-up of price over marginal cost in the monopoly sector (causing a too low production level of manufactures)
The wedge between MRT and MRS is produced by the mark-up of price from the monopoly. In perfect competition this wedge does not exist anymore (MRT=MRS) because there is no mark-up on price in perfect competition (p=MC).
Cournot
COURNOT:
Demand-price combinations are a function of both outputs, so is each firm’s profit
Firm A maximizes profits given the output level of firm B, say qB0.
Firm A then picks optimal output along line qB0 to max profit, say at point A0 (the higher the quantity, the smaller the price).
To be optimal, firm A’s iso-profit curve must be tangent at point A0.
The curve connecting all firm A’s optimal responses to changes in firm B’s output level is called A’s reaction curve.
If firm B produces a higher level of output, say qB1, firm A will adjust its optimal output.
In this case, it will reduce output to point A1; this point must again be tangent to A’s iso-profit curve.
Similarly for levels qB2, qB3 leading to points A2 and A3.
Obviously, firm A’s profits are maximized if firm B produces nothing as firm A is then a monopolist.
Maximum profits are thus reached at point qmon,A.
Firm A’s iso-profit curves therefore increase in the direction of the arrows towards point qmon,A.
Intra-Industry Trade
INTRA INDUSTRY TRADE:
Is when a country simultaneously imports and exports similar types of goods/services, that is trade within the same industry or sector.
The Dixit-Stiglitz (DS) monopolistic competition model explains intra-industry trade:
- Paul Krugman realized that the exported goods are usually similar, but not identical to, the imported goods.
- Consumers like to demand different varieties, Krugman builds on the Dixit-Stiglitz (DS) monopolistic competition model to explain intra-industry trade
- Utility function: U = utility, i = variety index, ci = consumption of variety i, N = number of varieties, ???? = parameter
- The demand for variety i is characterized by constant price elasticity of demand
- MR = MC – mark-up – positive operating profits production requires fixed costs fW.
- If op > fW firms enter the market, otherwise they exit.
- If new firms enter the market, firm i’s demand falls
- Output decreases to q’ but, does not affect the price p (constant mark-up)
- Operating profits fall.
- Firms enter the market until op = fW
- Zero-profit condition determines the number of varieties N produced (proportional to the size of the market).