Understanding Theoretical and Practical Reason: A Philosophical Analysis

Theoretical and Practical Reason

Theoretical Reason: This approach contemplates the world, seeking to decipher, explain, and understand it without necessarily focusing on practical application or direct knowledge of reality.

Practical Reason: This involves using reason to guide actions, setting aside assumptions and passions to achieve a moral ideal defined by reason itself.

Rationalism vs. Empiricism

RationalismEmpiricism
Core BeliefTrust in reason as the primary source of knowledge.Trust in sensory experience as the primary source of knowledge.
Knowledge SourceReason is fundamental. Knowledge is universal, rational, and necessarily true, derived from innate ideas. Ideas precede things.Experience is the limit and criterion of all true knowledge. There is nothing in the understanding (tabula rasa) that has not entered through the senses.
Reason’s RoleReason is reduced to thinking (drawing consequences) and understanding (relating data from experience).
Innate IdeasAffirmed.Denied.
ModelMathematical (truths of reason).Empirical science and physics (truths of fact).
Metaphysical InvestigationReality has a rational internal structure (written in mathematical characters). There is correspondence between innate ideas and reality. All assumptions should be questioned.
Ethical ImplicationsEthical values have a universal and a priori value.Ethical values originate in experience (pleasure/pain) and express feelings. Ethical relativism.

Skepticism

  • Logical Skepticism: Absolutely denies any knowledge.
  • Metaphysical Skepticism (Positivism): Denies knowledge of anything that cannot be proven with science.
  • Axiological Skepticism (Values): Questions religious and ethical values, suggesting that moral values have no universal validity. It doesn’t deny religious objects but denies knowledge of them because they cannot be known.
  • Methodical Skepticism: Questions the method (science, hypothetico-deductive method). Nothing is affirmed initially; everything should be checked, and there should be a possibility of error.
  • Francis Bacon’s Theory of Idols: Prejudices that interfere with understanding (idols of the tribe, idols of the cave, idols of the theater).
  • Systematic Skepticism: Doubts everything, even doubt itself.

Theories of Truth

  • Correspondence Theory: The truth is only true if it corresponds with what is known. This involves:
    • The object.
    • The subject and its representation of the object.
  • Coherence Theory: Formulated by Hegel, this theory uses the coherence of a proposition as the criterion of truth. Nothing is true or false in isolation; truth makes sense within a system. Meaning depends on the context.
  • Pragmatist Theory: Accepts correspondence but interprets it in terms of the usefulness of statements in solving vital problems. Truth is adaptation: a statement is true if it is suitable for solving problems or meeting needs.
  • Consensual Theory: Defended by Peirce, Apel, and Habermas, this theory stresses the need for dialogue as a framework for cooperatively discovering the truth of propositions. Truth is what people agree is true.